Tanner Koziol
Houston
· age 23.2
Consensus Rank
185
Colors: elite (top 10%)·strong·weak·bottom 10%all within TE cohort (n=35)
NFL.com
5.95
ACS
5.8
40
4.70
HT
6'7"
WT
247
Arm
33.8
PFF Col
78.9
Mock→
—
Flags
0
Visits
0
Bench —
Vert —
Broad —
3c 7.32
Shut 4.48
Hand 9.8
Age 23.2
Measurables
HT (in)78.50
WT (lb)247
Arm33.75
Hand9.75
404.70
Bench—
Vert—
Broad—
3-cone7.32
Shuttle4.48
By Source
acs-2026
overall5.79
pct_forty5.53
pct_heightInches9.53
pct_weightLbs2.84
brugler
age23.23
armInches33.75
forty4.70
handInches9.75
heightInches78.50
tenYardSplit1.61
weightLbs247
wingspanInches80.75
nfl.com
armInches33.75
athleticismScore73.71
forty4.70
handInches9.75
heightInches78.50
shuttle4.48
threeCone7.32
weightLbs194
Archetype
Average athlete · ACS 5.8/10
All-Star Game Performance
- Senior Bowl 2026www.cbssports.comHouston TE Tanner Koziol climbing the ladder for a TD to end National Team practices here at the Senior Bowl.He has to be rising up NFL draft boards. pic.twitter.com/itQBOM9d5Z Draft projection: Round 3/4 Slaughter looks like an NFL-ready interior lineman.
Athletic Composite (ACS)
5.8/ 10
position percentile vs 2006-2024 cohort (n ≈ 3,500+ historical picks)
- forty5.5
- heightInches9.5
- weightLbs2.8
Historical Projection
based on 2006-2024 draft outcomes (n≈137 per attribute · confidence high)Composite
15
0-100 scale
Expected career AV: 11.0
Attribute Contributions
- 40-yardr=+0.314.70z=+0.02+0.0
- Broad jumpr=+0.29—z=—+0.0
- Verticalr=+0.27—z=—+0.0
- 3-coner=+0.197.32z=-1.15-2.1
- Draft ager=+0.1423.23z=-0.87-1.2
- Heightr=+0.0778.50z=+1.40+1.0
- Shuttler=+0.074.48z=-0.91-0.6
- Bench repsr=-0.02—z=—+0.0
- Weightr=-0.01247z=-0.58+0.0
PFF College — Opponent-Adjusted
Overall78.9
Receiving87.3
Pass Block56.7
Run Block46.0
Scouting Dossier
PFF
Strengths
● Taller frame, with a long torso and room to add weight
● Outstanding pass-catching ability, thanks to his hands and tracking skills
● Can climb the ladder and bring down throws
● Maintains focus in traffic to come away with 50-50 balls
● Works to achieve proper blocking angles in attempts to lose slowly
● Assignment-sound with duties as a blocker
● Worked overtime to add 25-plus pounds over the past year (NFL-driven decision)
● Personable — always has a smile on his face
● Elite career receiving production, especially over the past two seasons
Weaknesses
● High cut and narrowly built, with mediocre bulk (especially in his lower body)
● Questionable point-of-attack strength in all areas
● Struggles to put down roots against length and power
● Doesn’t block with competitive grit desired for the position
● Adequate route runner for college, but it’ll be a different story in the NFL
● Short-area routes need better attention to detail
● Upright and struggles to drop his weight to snap out of breaks
● Tape doesn’t show a formidable run-after-catch threat
● Wasn’t a full-time special teams contributor
Projection
A one-year starter at Houston (and three-and-a-half-year starter overall), Koziol was primarily detached (50.9 percent of snaps in the
slot) in offensive coordinator Slade Nagle’s scheme. A former receiver who moved to tight end, his impact steadily increased over four
seasons at Ball State — and his production didn’t fall off much after moving to Houston in 2025. He combined for 168 catches over the
past two seasons, most in the FBS over that span.
Koziol is a vacuum at the catch point. He has an outstanding catch radius to track, adjust and make plays on the football, pulling in
throws with his body length and hand strength. His route running and separation aren’t as consistent, but the main concern for the next
level is his blocking upside. Though he has made a conscious effort to add quality weight, his mediocre play strength and questionable
toughness will be hard to mask in the NFL. Overall, Koziol will be ranked higher by teams who put a premium on ball skills
or are looking for a “big slot” weapon. He’ll be lower for teams looking for more of a true Y or well-rounded tight
end.
200 Back to table of contents
-- 204 of 629 --
Mock Ranks (1)
- MDD-consensus185
Freak Notes
- none
Best Team Fits
Open in Fit Engine →- no fits scored yet